monopoly

Microsoft's desktop prowess: Blessing or curse?

"The die is cast," declared Julius Caesar, anticipating Microsoft's fateful decision to protect its Windows cash cow at all costs.

Years later, as Joe Nocera eloquently opines in The New York Times, Microsoft has tethered itself to its Windows operating system and almost certainly lost its way on the Internet as a result:

Windows is already dying a death by a thousand cuts. Yes, Microsoft still makes billions by selling pre-installed Windows via computer manufacturers. But ever-so-gradually, the Internet is upending its business model just as surely as it has upended models for the music, television and … Read more

Google explains: We're not a monopoly, not by a long shot

Barring some unlikely bolt of inspiration at Microsoft, Google should continue to pad its already formidable lead in search advertising. And now that Google CEO Eric Schmidt says the company intends to turn its attention to display ads, who of sane mind would bet against its chances?

We're still quite a way from the point where regulators conclude that Google is too big for its britches, but just for fun, I typed the question, "Is Google a monopoly?" into my search engine. (Wanna guess which search engine I use?) My query brought back 461,000 responses. Clearly, … Read more

So when do we get it over with and declare Google a monopoly?

I did a double take recently after listening to Microsoft CFO Chris Liddell acknowledge that his company was ready to lose even more money in online services in the near term, if that's what it takes to catch Google. During the company's earnings call last week, Liddell indicated that Microsoft is pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into its online advertising business, an investment he allowed would be "a drag" on the rest of the company.

Outside of the occasional fit of Monkeyboy inspiration, Microsoft's managers are a sober bunch. They don't decide things … Read more

I want the old Microsoft back

Microsoft's business has never been better. Ironically, that may well be the problem.

I will admit to a love/hate relationship with Microsoft. I tend to respect Microsoft's technology but not the business practices wrapped around it. In fairness to Microsoft, it has traditionally been the latter that really drives its business, pushing the company into new markets.

Of late, however, Microsoft's successful business strategies seem to be stifling, not stimulating, the company. The company's success at hoarding existing monopolies seems to have made it intellectually lazy in seeking new ones. Even SharePoint, which has been phenomenally successful financially, is little more than a lightweight portal designed to prop up Microsoft's existing businesses: Office, SQL Server, Windows, etc.

This may be good for the industry, but it's certainly not good for Microsoft. Whatever Microsoft may think of itself, it has never been much of a technology pioneer, preferring instead to copy others' ideas but deliver them more conveniently and at better pricing.

Not anymore.… Read more

AMD court papers allege special Intel deals with PC makers

Advanced Micro Devices filed more legal papers this week alleging monopolistic practices by Intel. Some of AMD's allegations involving PC makers are the most intriguing. Even when large blocks of text have been redacted. Moreover, the stridency of the language approaches that of the attacks from Nvidia's CEO in previous weeks.

AMD in June 2005 filed an antitrust complaint against Intel claiming that Intel illegally maintained a monopoly in the market for microprocessors.

As part of the ongoing legal process, AMD filed a response (to Intel's Preliminary Pretrial Statement) on Thursday with the U.S. district court … Read more

A unique brand of monopoly

A patent is a deal with the U.S. government. In exchange for elevating the knowledge of the public in general by publishing a description of an invention, the government gives, in return, a "monopoly."

But the monopoly in the patent world is a different animal than what most would consider a true monopoly. When most people think about a monopoly, they think of the ability of one person or company to assert dominance in a certain market by being the only seller of a product. That is not the case in the patent world. A patent does not guarantee any dominance in any market whatsoever; in fact, it does not even give the patent holder the right to make the patented product at all.

While seemingly counterintuitive, this is the way the patent system has to work because of the nature of patentable inventions. Sir Isaac Newton, arguably one of the greatest scientists and inventors of all time, perfectly but unintentionally characterized the patent system when he said, "If I have seen further it is by standing on ye shoulders of Giants."

… Read more

Buzz Out Loud 703: No doughnuts, no peace

If Flickr's not buying doughnuts for the world, then Tom's not buying. But he's in San Francisco, so he won't have to buy his own doughnut anyway. It's a doughnut paradox. Also, Psystar lays down the smack on Apple's Mac OS X EULA and really, we only care about one thing today: rocket racing. For real. Rockets. Racing. Awesome. Listen now: Download today's podcast EPISODE 703

Psystar: Apple's terms violate U.S. monopoly laws http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1685

Elusive 'Twitter ads' spotted in the wild http://www.news.com/8301-13577_3-9919041-36.html… Read more

Apple's brand up, Microsoft's brand down

A group of international marketers cites Apple and Google as two of the top-four brands that they "can't live without." Microsoft? "Microsoft is the top brand they wanted to argue with and also the top name they wanted to rebrand."

In a separate survey of 12,000 US business people, Microsoft's "brand power" dropped from number one in 1996 to number 59 in 2008. That precipitous drop doesn't bode well, obviously:

...[A] decline in and of itself is not indicative that a company is losing its mindshare or reputation among customers. … Read more

Microsoft +/vs. Novell: The rich irony of then and now

There is a tragic (but rich) irony in the news that Microsoft failed in its appeal to throw out Novell's decade-old antitrust lawsuit against it. On one hand, you have Novell arguing (rightly) in court that Microsoft unfairly bullies competitors:

"Microsoft specifically targeted WordPerfect and Novell's other office productivity applications because they threatened Microsoft's Windows monopoly," according to the Novell court filing quoted by the Bloomberg news service.

In its case, Novell also said that Microsoft withheld technical information to make WordPerfect work with Windows 95.

On the other hand, we see Novell supping at the feet of Microsoft to revive its Linux business, conveniently forgetting that what Microsoft giveth, Microsoft taketh away the minute a competitor becomes inconvenient. But the irony gets better as we dig into Novell's complaint with Groklaw:… Read more